Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Modeling’ Category

Major Hurricane Matthew left a trail of destruction in its wake from the Caribbean up through the U.S. East Coast.  As Hurricane Matthew tracked northward along a large portion of the U.S. Southeast Coast from Florida to North Carolina, the rainfall impacts worsened.  Figure 1 shows the weekly rainfall spanning 4-11 October, ranging from ~2-8 inches along the Florida East Coast to 10-20 inches in the eastern Carolinas.  Since antecedent soil moisture was highest in the eastern Carolinas (Fig. 2), the extreme rainfall led to the most serious flooding in this area.

fig1

Fig. 1.  Weekly rainfall totals from 4 – 11 October 2016.

fig2

Fig. 2.  Total Column (0-2 m) relative soil moisture prior to Hurricane Matthew’s impact on North and South Carolina, valid at 0000 UTC 7 October 2016.

Referring back to the precipitation totals in Fig. 1, we can see that there was a sharp rainfall gradient on the northwestern edge in the Middle Atlantic region.  Interestingly, this gradient in Hurricane Matthew’s rainfall coincided with a pre-existing transition zone between wet conditions near the Atlantic coast and drought conditions further inland from the Appalachians through New England.  The net result was to accentuate the wet-dry contrast already in place.  The animation in Fig. 3 highlights this contrast nicely by presenting the SPoRT-LIS daily total-column relative soil moisture percentiles from 1-12 October.  The percentiles are based off a 1981-2013 daily soil moisture climatology that SPoRT produced from its ~3-km resolution SPoRT-LIS simulation.  By 9 October, notice the incredible transition from excessively wet soil moisture exceeding the 98th percentile (Carolinas through the southern half of Delaware) to extremely dry soil moisture less than the 5th percentile across Pennsylvania into the Northeast (as well as much of the inland Southeastern U.S.).  In fact, total column soil moisture values are less than the 2nd percentile over a large part of Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and the New England states, indicative of the ongoing severe drought there.

fig3_loop

Fig. 3. Daily animation of SPoRT-LIS total column relative soil moisture percentile from 1 to 12 October 2016.

Read Full Post »

So, we’ve finally begun the process of transitioning over fully to the new CONUS version of the SPoRT LIS.  This “new” version of the SPoRT LIS has been under development actually for several years now, and underwent initial testing and evaluation at the Huntsville WFO in spring 2015, followed by an evaluation by several WFOs and RFCs in summer 2015.  Image 1 below shows the differences in the domains.  The new version of the SPoRT LIS encompasses the entire CONUS and surrounding areas of southern Canada and northern Mexico, albeit with some anticipated degradation especially in the border regions due to lack of consistent radar/precipitation coverage.

lispostimage1_28sep2016

Image 1. The CONUS SPoRT LIS (left) and the approximate domain of the old Southeast CONUS version (right).  Note: the images are from different periods.

Not only does the CONUS version offer a geographic expansion over the previous version of the LIS, but new variables are a part of the new SPoRT LIS, including 0-200 cm relative soil moisture changes on several timescales (weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, seasonal, semi-annual and annual) soil moisture percentiles and soil temperatures.  The soil moisture percentiles and change values can be especially useful for the drought designation and analysis process, and have been used in this capacity at the Huntsville office since their inception.  Of course, there are other applications for hydrology, fire weather and blowing dust.  We’re planning to explore more of these latter unique and interesting applications with several of SPoRT’s collaborative Western CONUS WFOs next spring and summer.  The SPoRT LIS soil temperature data have shown promising application for impacts during winter weather events during evaluation of a few events in the previous winter, with more evaluation expected during the upcoming winter.  In addition to the new variables, the new version of the SPoRT LIS is using NSSL’s Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor data for precipitation forcing in the near term and is also solely incorporating the VIIRS GVF over the legacy MODIS GVF.

lispostimage2_28sep2016

Image 2. Examples of SPoRT LIS 0-200 cm relative soil moisture weekly change (left) and 0-200 cm relative soil moisture percentile (right)

Users of the SPoRT LIS and GVF data for their local modeling purposes will need to make the appropriate changes to their EMS/UEMS model runs to properly incorporate these new data sets.  Please contact Jon Case at SPoRT or me (Kris White) if you have any questions.  Thanks for reading!

Read Full Post »

A significant flooding event occurred over the U.S. Deep South from 8-10 March 2016 due to a slow-moving low pressure/front from southern Texas to the Mississippi River, combined with a deep tropical moisture plume.  Tremendous rainfall totals of 4-8″+ were depicted by the Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) 1-km gauge-corrected radar rainfall estimate product for consecutive 24-hour periods ending 1200 UTC 9 March and 10 March 2016 (Fig. 1).  The MRMS gridded product provides short-term input precipitation estimates to the real-time Land Information System (LIS) run at the NASA Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT) Center.

Fig1_MRMS2dayPrecip

Fig. 1.  Rainfall estimates from the Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) gauge-adjusted radar product for the 24-h period ending (a) 1200 UTC 9 Mar 2016, and (b) 1200 UTC 10 Mar 2016.

The soil moisture response to the heavy rainfall was captured nicely by NASA’s Soil Moisture Active-Passive (SMAP) satellite Level 2 retrieval product of 0-5 cm volumetric soil moisture for the early morning overpass across the Central U.S from 9 March (Fig. 2a).  Very high retrieved volumetric soil moisture of 0.45 or higher is seen from eastern Texas across much of northern Louisiana and southern/central Arkansas, aligned well with the areas that received the heaviest rainfall.  The corresponding SPoRT-LIS modeled soil moisture analysis for the 0-10 cm layer of the Noah land surface model (Fig. 2b) shows a reasonable agreement with the SMAP retrieved soil moisture but with slightly less dynamic range than the SMAP data — a reasonable result given that the SMAP retrieval is valid over a shallower, near-surface layer than the LIS top model layer.

Fig2_SMAPL2_LIS

Fig. 2.  (a) Soil Moisture Active-Passive (SMAP) 0-5 cm volumetric soil moisture retrieval valid 1223 UTC 9 Mar 2016, and (b) corresponding SPoRT-Land Information System (LIS) 0-10 cm volumetric soil moisture analysis valid 1200 UTC 9 Mar 2016.

The SPoRT-LIS total column relative soil moisture (RSM) has been found to qualitatively correlate with areas of river/areal flooding when exceeding ~60% across northern Alabama.  The depiction of total column RSM from the early morning of 10 March shows a large area exceeding 65% (blue  shading in Fig. 3a) across eastern Texas, northern Louisiana, and southern/central Arkansas.  The weekly change in total column RSM (Fig. 3b) highlights the regions that experienced the largest increases in soil moisture in response to the heavy rainfall.  As the soil approaches saturation/field capacity, most new rainfall goes directly to runoff, thereby exacerbating the flooding situation.

Fig3_LISrsm02m

Fig. 3.  SPoRT-LIS analysis valid 1200 UTC 10 Mar 2016 of (a) total column relative soil moisture (RSM), and (b) one-week change in total column RSM.

Another product available from the real-time SPoRT-LIS is the total column RSM percentile, which shows how anomalous the current soil moisture conditions are relative to a historical, 33-year climatological database of modeled soil moisture. The percentile product from the morning of 10 March (Fig. 4) shows that areas of eastern Texas and northwestern Louisiana (and a few other spots) exceed the 98th percentile for the current day — indicating that these present-day soil moisture values are about the most moist it has been in the last 33+ years for 10 March.

Notice that there are a few anomalous “bulls-eyes” of dry percentiles in southern/eastern Arkansas.  These areas are caused by corrupt input precipitation data driving the SPoRT-LIS land surface model simulation.  The issue is currently being corrected by the operational organizations managing the rain gauge input.  However, it should be noted that SPoRT is working to implement near real-time data assimilation of the SMAP Level 2 soil moisture retrievals into its LIS simulation.  Routine assimilation of SMAP satellite soil moisture will help correct anomalies caused by poor input precipitation, thereby resulting in more robust soil moisture analyses for situational awareness and disaster-response applications.

Fig4_percentile_20160310

Fig. 4. SPoRT-LIS total column RSM percentile valid 1200 UTC 10 Mar 2016.

Finally, the areas of active flooding at U.S. Geological stream gauges and the NOAA/NWS flood watch/warning map are given in Fig. 5 for the afternoon of 10 March.  The axis of flash flood warnings (dark red color) aligns quite well with the total column RSM percentiles exceeding the 98th percentile in Fig. 4, whereas the broader footprint of all flood warnings/watches corresponds closely with the total column RSM above the 65% value (blue shading in Fig. 3a).

Fig5_flooding

Fig. 5.  Plot of U.S. Geological Survey stream gauges with active flooding (top), and NOAA/NWS active [flash] flood watches and warnings (bottom-right) for the afternoon of 10 Mar 2016.

Read Full Post »

A closed upper low over the Southeastern U.S. combined with a deep tropical moisture connection with Hurricane Joaquin led to historic rainfall and flooding over North and especially South Carolina over the weekend.  A wide swath of central South Carolina from the coast to Columbia received over 20 inches of rainfall in the past week (Fig. 1), much of it in the last 2-3 days.  Figure 2 shows the NASA Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) 24-h rainfall estimates displayed in AWIPS II compared to the official NWS/River Forecast Center rainfall estimate for the period ending 1200 UTC on 4 October.  This is erasing the prevailing drought in the Carolinas, which still had moderate to severe drought in the most recent U.S. Drought Monitor weekly product valid 29 September (Fig. 3).

SPoRT’s real-time configuration of the NASA Land Information System (SPoRT-LIS) runs the Noah land surface model to generate a “best modeled” soil moisture estimate at ~3-km resolution for enhanced situational awareness and input to local/regional numerical weather prediction models.  The SPoRT-LIS was assessed during summer/fall 2014 by the NOAA/NWS weather forecast offices (WFOs) at Houston, TX, Raleigh, NC, and Huntsville, AL. Following an expansion to a full Continental U.S. domain, the SPoRT-LIS was also evaluated more informally by the NWS WFOs at Tucson, AZ and Albuquerque, NM this past summer.  The primary areas of utility has been in drought monitoring and assessing areal and river flooding potential.  However, the Southwestern U.S. offices applied SPoRT-LIS soil moisture fields to enhance situational awareness for wildfire and blowing dust situations as well. Overall, a majority of the users during these assessments expressed substantial utility of the product due to a lack of other real-time high-resolution soil moisture products, and were confident enough to use the product as part of operational, public forecasts.

This extreme rainfall event in the Carolinas was captured nicely by the real-time SPoRT-LIS, which depicted some of the most dramatic changes in total column soil moisture ever documented by SPoRT collaborators.  Figure 4 compares the SPoRT-LIS 0-2 m total column relative soil moisture (RSM) from 28 September (left panel) and 5 October (right panel), with Figure 5 highlighting the 1-week change in 0-2 m RSM as displayed in AWIPS II.  The RSM represents how the volumetric soil moisture scales between wilting (0%) and saturation (100%) for a given soil composition, where the wilting point indicates that vegetation can no longer extract moisture from the soil and saturation indicates no more infiltration is possible (thus all new precipitation goes to runoff). Previous experience by the Huntsville WFO found that total column RSM values of ~60% and above tend to indicate an enhanced threat for areal and river flooding over northern Alabama; however, these thresholds can vary depending on river basin properties and regional soil composition.

Values of total column RSM typically ranged from ~25-35% on 28 September, prior to the significant rain event.  However, by 5 October, total column RSM increased to well above 65% in most areas of central South Carolina, and parts of southern and far western North Carolina.  The maximum weekly change in 0-2 m RSM (Fig. 5) exceeds 58% in central South Carolina — a value never documented in the recent years of real-time SPoRT-LIS output!  Most areas of SPoRT-LIS 0-2 m RSM exceeding ~60% correspond to areas of active minor to major river flooding across parts of southern Virginia and the Carolinas, as depicted in the USGS/NOAA river gauge network this morning (Fig. 6).

Finally, SPoRT is producing an experimental daily, real-time soil moisture percentile product based on a 33-year LIS-Noah county-by-county soil moisture climatology.  The soil moisture percentile map indicates where the current 0-2 m RSM soil moisture values lie in the present day’s historical soil moisture distribution for every county in the Continental U.S. The percentile product valid at 1200 UTC 27 September and 4 October is shown in Figure 7.  Primarily dry soil moisture values between ~5th-30th percentile are prevalent across the Carolinas on 27 September, corresponding reasonably well to the U.S. Drought Monitor moderate to severe drought areas from Figure 3. However, after the 10-20+ inches of rainfall over the past week, the 4 October soil moisture percentiles completely reversed across the region, with values > 98th percentile occurring in central South Carolina where the most severe flooding is taking place.  SPoRT plans to develop a brief training module on this percentile product prior to dissemination for display in AWIPS II at NWS WFOs, along with the current suite of SPoRT-LIS fields already available in AWIPS II.

Fig. 1. NWS River Forecast Center rainfall analysis for the week ending 1200 UTC 5 October 20125.

Fig. 1. NWS River Forecast Center rainfall analysis for the week ending 1200 UTC 5 October 2015.

Fig. 2. Comparison of NASA Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) rainfall estimate to the NWS/River Forecast Center analysis for the 24-hour period ending 1200 UTC 4 October 2015.

Fig. 2. Comparison of NASA Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) rainfall estimate to the NWS/River Forecast Center analysis for the 24-hour period ending 1200 UTC 4 October 2015.

Fig. 2. U.S. Drought Monitor weekly drought product valid 29 September 2015.

Fig. 3. U.S. Drought Monitor weekly drought product valid 29 September 2015.

Fig. 3. SPoRT-LIS total column (0-2 m) relative soil moisture valid on (left panel) 28 September, and (right panel) 5 October 2015.

Fig. 4. SPoRT-LIS total column (0-2 m) relative soil moisture valid on (left panel) 28 September, and (right panel) 5 October 2015.  Masked white areas represent water or urban pixels.

Fig. 4. One-week change in SPoRT-LIS total column relative soil moisture for the week ending 5 October 2015, as displayed in AWIPS II.

Fig. 5. One-week change in SPoRT-LIS total column relative soil moisture for the week ending 5 October 2015, as displayed in AWIPS II.  Maximum weekly change value > 58% is highlighted by the cursor position.  Masked black areas represent water or urban pixels.

Fig. 6. USGS and NWS River Forecast Center river gauge plot for the morning of 5 October 2015. River gauges experiencing flooding are indicated by the legend in the lower-right.

Fig. 6. USGS / NWS River Forecast Center river gauge plot for the morning of 5 October 2015. River gauges experiencing flooding are indicated by the legend in the lower-right.

Fig. 5. Experimental SPoRT-LIS total column relative soil moisture percentile product, valid at 1200 UTC on (left panel) 27 September, and (right panel) 4 October 2015.

Fig. 7. Experimental SPoRT-LIS total column relative soil moisture percentile product, valid at 1200 UTC on (left panel) 27 September, and (right panel) 4 October 2015.  Masked white areas represent water or urban pixels.

Read Full Post »

As mentioned in the previous post, we were concerned about the potential of organized thunderstorm outflow creating favorable conditions for blowing dust, as well as previous heavy rain activity increasing the potential for flash flooding in portions of Southeast Arizona yesterday (Sep 2) and today.  We have been trying to use LIS data as part of our process in determining the threat of both of these problems.  Yesterday was a mixed bag as I briefly outline below with less than full cooperation from the atmosphere.

Convective initiation occurred in locations we expected (similar to the WRF output posted previously), however we were unable to get the chain reaction of outflows that we hoped for.  We had problems in many valley locations (especially the Tucson Metro area) with early debris cloud and then anvils from early convection blocking solar insolation. We also underestimated the eastern extent of a modest low level drying trend filtering in from western Pima county.

Below is a loop of velocities with some observation and warning overlays early yesterday afternoon. The initial 45 kt outflow from the SVR southeast of Tucson attenuated rapidly as it approached Tucson.  Readings from Davis-Monthan AFB on the southeast side of Tucson at 2137Z showed a gust out of the SE at 30kts, and shortly later Tucson International Airport (a couple of miles further west) registered 23 kts.  By the time the outflow was west of Tucson it was difficult to detect.  There was no additional activity along this outflow in Pima County and it certainly wasn’t strong enough on it’s own to generate any dust problems by the time it got to areas we were concerned about.  The initial area that it started southeast of Tucson does have dust issues at times, but referring back to the soil moisture imagery from the previous post, things were pretty wet there.

sep2velsvr

It was an active day however.  Below is a composite post of the Severe Thunderstorm (yellow) and Flash Flood (green) products we issued yesterday.  When you compare to the 09z LIS output posted yesterday, the Flash Flood warnings were issued in an area with relative soil moistures above 70 percent (posted again for convenience).

severe and flash sep 2

soilmstrdusttue-20150902_090000

We once again have a favorable atmospheric profile for strong storms today (Sep 3), but with a little more convective inhibition to overcome and continuing issues with cloud cover.  We do have a stronger impulse embedded in the southwesterly flow that will push into our area late today and this evening.  Most standard and mesoscale model output (including latest UofA WRF and national HRRR) show increased coverage and organization of thunderstorm activity by late afternoon, especially west of Tucson.  This seems very reasonable, keeping the aforementioned caveats in mind.

A look at today’s LIS output shows that soil conditions are even more favorable in the areas of concern west and northwest of Tucson.  Especially in eastern Pinal and Maricopa counties with widespread values below 15 percent:

sep3mrnsoil-20150903_090000

Some of the special communications to our partners and the general public yesterday morning extended into mentions of issues for today as well.  We will adjust our weather story and social media posts to reflect the latest information, but our message is similar to yesterday.  We will again coordinate with Phoenix about any possible coordinated dust headline later this morning.  An example of the partner email we sent yesterday below:

BriefingUAPD09022015

Read Full Post »

We continue to use LIS data to increase our awareness of potential flood prone areas, as well as potential problems with convective dust storms.  An example below of interaction with the Phoenix office on 12Planet this morning where we discuss possible dust problems and inserting blowing dust in weather grids:

gfe-VB2

Below are this morning’s volumetric and relative soil moistures.  It highlights 2 concerns for us today.  The first is the area of heavy rain we saw 36 hours ago in the Tucson area and surrounding mountains is still very much reflected in soil moistures.  This will be one of the main areas of concern for potential flash flooding today.  The second concern is dust, with dry antecedent soil conditions a concern in favored blowing dust areas Pinal, Maricopa and central Pima counties.

soilmstrdusttue-20150902_090000

Finally, below is a look at the University of Arizona WRF-NAM 10m wind showing some very interesting convective outflows. The first generated around the Tucson area this afternoon from the strong potential of our atmospheric profile today, and the second southwest of Tucson after 00z from the influence of an impulse embedded in the moist southwesterly flow early this evening:

wrfnamwind1-20150902_200000

wrfnamwind2-20150902_210000

wrfnamwind3-20150902_220000

wrfnamwind4-20150903_020000

wrfnamwind5-20150903_030000

wrfnamwind6-20150903_040000

So that will be what we’re watching closely for today.  After a review of the 12z data, the day shift will coordinate with the Phoenix office on the possible issuance of an extended long fuse Blowing Dust Advisory.  We will also be issuing a partner coordination e-mail to local and state officials on this potential, and a heightened awareness weather story for the web site and social media.

Read Full Post »

Large wildfires during the heart of the southwest monsoon season are a fairly rare occurrence most years. Lightning sparked fires are typical in late June and early July before mainly dry thunderstorms transition to a wetter variety. These fires can be managed by land agencies while awaiting higher humidities to develop over the area.  July 2015 was a very wet month for much of New Mexico (10th wettest July), with the exception of northwestern New Mexico where near normal precipitation was observed. August turned much drier for many areas of the state as monsoon moisture and instability focused over Arizona. On August 19th, the Navajo River Fire broke out northwest of Dulce, NM, quickly growing to more than 1,000 acres by the 20th. The photo below taken by Bryon Odallac shows an established smoke plume emanating from the nearby higher terrain on August 20th.  The NASA SPoRT 0-10cm relative soil moisture imagery showed dry conditions coinciding with this same area of northwestern NM. The location of the wildfire is indicated by the “home” text. The 10-40cm relative soil moisture is also shown since it has been suggested that deeper layer soil moisture may better represent fuel conditions in more mature timber areas rather than the near surface duff layer. It is interesting to note that the 10-40cm layer values are actually wetter than the 0-10cm layer over much of this area. The two largest wildfires of the July to August monsoon period of 2015 have both occurred in these dry islands (see August 4, 2015 post on Fort Craig Wildfire).

Navajo River Fire captured by Bryon Odallac on August 20, 2015 near Dulce, NM.

Navajo River Fire captured by Bryon Odallac on August 20, 2015 near Dulce, NM.

 

NASA SPoRT LIS 0-10cm Relative Soil Moisture valid 00Z 21 Aug 2015.

 

NASA SPoRT LIS 10-40cm Relative Soil Moisture valid 00z 21 Aug 15.

NASA SPoRT LIS 10-40cm Relative Soil Moisture valid 00z 21 Aug 15.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »